On Fri, 7 Jul 2000, Bill Stewart wrote:

> The current UK effort is why we also need "Perfect Forward Secrecy
> In Everything"; it's hard to force someone to turn over their
> decryption keys when their equipment doesn't store them past a
> session, and it's easier to argue that you shouldn't be required to
> turn over a signature key that can only be used for forgery than a
> decryption key which could reveal past session keys.

IANAL but wouldn't the UK's proposed legislation make software that
won't provide access to all keys implicitly illegal?

--d

-- 
| "Bombay is 250ms from New York in the new world order" - Alan Cox
| Damien Miller - http://www.mindrot.org/
| Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) -or- [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work)




Reply via email to