Thor Lancelot Simon <t...@rek.tjls.com> writes: >That doesn't make any sense. DT in that generator is really meant to serve >the role of a counter, and, in fact, the test harness for that generator >*requires* it to be a counter. > >The seed for that generator is K.
Well, at least in your opinion it is :-). And this illustrates the problem here, just from the small number of contributors to this thread (including some off-list ones) we've already had a whole pile of different opinions on how to apply the PRNGs, and as with the labs there's quite some leeway in the interpretations. The problem is that the labs take the most conservative, restrictive interpretation possible for CYA purposes while the people on here take the best security-engineering interpretation. The CYA approach may be safe in terms of making it hard to challenge a ruling afterwards, but it's not the best way to engineer a secure device or system. Peter. --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majord...@metzdowd.com