On 2013-09-17 07:37, Peter Gutmann wrote: > Tony Arcieri <basc...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Bill Frantz <fra...@pwpconsult.com> wrote: >>> After Rijndael was selected as AES, someone suggested the really paranoid >>> should super encrypt with all 5 finalests [...]. >> >> I wish there was a term for this sort of design in encryption systems beyond >> just "defense in depth". AFAICT there is not such a term. >> >> How about the Failsafe Principle? ;) > > How about Stannomillinery?
I like Stannopilosery better, but the first half is a keeper. Or, perhaps a bit incongruously, Stannopsaffery. Fun, Stephan _______________________________________________ The cryptography mailing list cryptography@metzdowd.com http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
