Patrick Pelletier <c...@funwithsoftware.org> writes: >I'm inclined to agree with you, but you might be interested/horrified in the >"1024 bits is enough for anyone" debate currently unfolding on the TLS list:
That's rather misrepresenting the situation. It's a debate between two groups, the security practitioners, "we'd like a PFS solution as soon as we can, and given currently-deployed infrastructure DH-1024 seems to be the best bet", and the theoreticians, "only a theoretically perfect solution is acceptable, even if it takes us forever to get it". (You can guess from that which side I'm on). Peter. _______________________________________________ The cryptography mailing list cryptography@metzdowd.com http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
