On 01/02/2012 13:32, William Whyte wrote :
> You can obviously prove it in the case where Alice claims she knows
> SHA-1(SHA-1(m)), which seems to be the same claim.
Alice discloses h and claims knowledge of m with h=SHA1(m).

That's not equivalent to claiming knowledge of SHA-1(SHA-1(m)),
which anyone can compute as SHA-1(h).

   Francois Grieu
_______________________________________________
cryptography mailing list
cryptography@randombit.net
http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography

Reply via email to