I have invented even simpler encryption method than yours that is also non-decrypt-able. It uses a special function F(x)=0 where 0 is only one bit.
It works like this: 1. Take plaintext P. 2. Ciphertext=F(P) No one can decrypt my ciphertext, and it has advantage over your method since it does not need much space (nor transmission). But I had also troubles to publish it on CRYPTO 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012. I will try this year on the Rump session. David On 6/18/12, Warren Kumari <war...@kumari.net> wrote: > I too have invented an encryption method that is not decrypt able by any > method. > > It woks like this: > 1: Take plaintext. > 2: XOR with a stream of random data, throw away the random data. > 3:… > 4: Profit! > > For some reason I cannot get folk to understand the brilliance of my method, > probably because they are all stupid, closed minded smelly jerks who > couldn't understand a good idea if it fell on them. > They all kept saying that having encryption that is not decryptable is > pointless, but rathter than listening to what the so called experts said, I > decided to simply rage against their opinions and, just for good measure, > insult them too… > > So far it's working great… > > W > > > > On Jun 18, 2012, at 6:56 AM, Givonne Cirkin wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> My name is Givon Zirkind. I am a computer scientist. I developed a >> method of encryption that is not decryptable by method. >> You can read my paper at: http://bit.ly/Kov1DE >> >> My colleagues agree with me. But, I have not been able to get pass peer >> review and publish this paper. In my opinion, the refutations are >> ridiculous and just attacks -- clear misunderstandings of the methods. >> They do not explain my methods and say why they do not work. >> >> I have a 2nd paper: http://bit.ly/LjrM61 >> This paper also couldn't get published. This too I was told doesn't >> follow the norm and is not non-decryptable. Which I find odd, because it >> is merely the tweaking of an already known method of using prime numbers. >> >> I am asking the hacking community for help. Help me test my methods. The >> following message is encrypted using one of my new methods. Logically, it >> should not be decryptable by "method". If you can decrypt it, please let >> me know you did & how. >> >> CipherText: >> >> 113-5-95-5-65-46-108-108-92-96-54-23-51-163-30-7-34-117-117-30-110-36-12-102-99-30-77-102 >> >> Thanks. >> >> I have a website about this: www.givonzirkind.weebly.com >> For information about the Transcendental Encryption Codec click on the >> "more" tab. >> Also, on Facebook, >> https://www.facebook.com/TranscendentalEncryptionCodecTec >> >> Givon Zirkind >> >> >> >> You @ 37.com - The world's easiest free Email address ! >> _______________________________________________ >> cryptography mailing list >> cryptography@randombit.net >> http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography > > -- > "Go on, prove me wrong. Destroy the fabric of the universe. See if I care." > -- Terry Prachett > > > _______________________________________________ > cryptography mailing list > cryptography@randombit.net > http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography > _______________________________________________ cryptography mailing list cryptography@randombit.net http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
