On that note, I really would love to hear from a lawyer as to why accepting bitcoin or anonymous donations would be problematic. Unless they start laundering money, I don't see that really being an issue.
On 21/10/2013 3:41 PM, Kyle Maxwell wrote: > On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Kelly John Rose <i...@kjro.se> wrote: >> I think it simply reduces to a desire to not be beholden to political >> interests. >> >> Regardless, I think if they can get the money from the Feds as well as >> other sources, they will have more money and more resources to build a >> good program and thus be a better product. >> >> The real problem only arises when the fed funding determines the >> direction of the project as a whole. If they remain transparent as to >> decision making, then that problem goes away. > > Agreed, plus the financial antics would make me concerned if my > non-profit *depended* on funding from that source. > > > -- > @kylemaxwell > -- Kelly John Rose Mississauga, ON Phone: +1 647 638-4104 Twitter: @kjrose Document contents are confidential between original recipients and sender. _______________________________________________ cryptography mailing list cryptography@randombit.net http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
