On Sun, 2013-11-03 at 04:17 +0000, Roth Paxton wrote: > Cryptographyuniversal.com is my website.@Niko. I accept your criticism > and you are correct that I was angry at the IACR when the site was > published. However I am only an amatuer cryptographer. Some of the > math is wrong. The site is merely an exposition of a new type of > cipher that is fairly strong. If you will take the time to read you > will notice that the structure of the cipher is sound and much more > manageable if the "matrices" (blocks) are reduced to 5 (4x4) (128 bit > blocks). I have been working on refining it but cannot alter my site > with my smartpad. Please ignore the massive size and concentrate more > on the structure.
Thanks for sharing. If I may, I would suggest structuring the website into sections with clear headers. Clearer wording would also help, for example, by "cube comprised of 1000 parts" you might mean a vector in some space of dimension 3. Perhaps you could give a step-by-step example of encryption with this algorithm, with very small matrices. It's hard to understand as it is. _______________________________________________ cryptography mailing list cryptography@randombit.net http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
