Source code would be nice as well.
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Mansour Moufid <mansourmou...@gmail.com>wrote: > On Sun, 2013-11-03 at 04:17 +0000, Roth Paxton wrote: > > > Cryptographyuniversal.com is my website.@Niko. I accept your criticism > > and you are correct that I was angry at the IACR when the site was > > published. However I am only an amatuer cryptographer. Some of the > > math is wrong. The site is merely an exposition of a new type of > > cipher that is fairly strong. If you will take the time to read you > > will notice that the structure of the cipher is sound and much more > > manageable if the "matrices" (blocks) are reduced to 5 (4x4) (128 bit > > blocks). I have been working on refining it but cannot alter my site > > with my smartpad. Please ignore the massive size and concentrate more > > on the structure. > > Thanks for sharing. > > If I may, I would suggest structuring the website into sections with > clear headers. Clearer wording would also help, for example, by "cube > comprised of 1000 parts" you might mean a vector in some space of > dimension 3. > > Perhaps you could give a step-by-step example of encryption with this > algorithm, with very small matrices. It's hard to understand as it is. > > > _______________________________________________ > cryptography mailing list > cryptography@randombit.net > http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography >
_______________________________________________ cryptography mailing list cryptography@randombit.net http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
