=?iso-8859-15?Q?Kriszti=E1n_Pint=E9r?= <[email protected]> writes: >you can make RSA safer adding more cycles and more code. or you can implement >it without blinding, and call it a day. it is inconceivable that nobody ever >will choose the latter "strategy".
I've mentioned this one before, but some time ago I asked as many of my users on embedded systems and other non-desktop-PC devices as I could get in touch with whether they'd be OK with having blinding turned on by default. The result is summarised in the following pie chart: O -- No, 100% Peter. _______________________________________________ cryptography mailing list [email protected] http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
