The system is vulnerable to a simple chosen plaintext attack as soon as you 
extract a workable scheme from the vague description in the paper (see appendix 
A for the closest thing to an actual specification of an encryption scheme). 

It should be an embarrassment to both Phys Rev X and the University of 
Lancaster (which does have a serious cyber security research group, who surely 
were not consulted by the university's press office). 

I'll write up the attack and post it on IACR eprint. 

Best,

Kenny


> On 10 Apr 2014, at 05:59, "Jeffrey Goldberg" <jeff...@goldmark.org> wrote:
> 
>> On 2014-04-09, at 7:17 PM, travis+ml-rbcryptogra...@subspacefield.org wrote:
>> 
>> http://threatpost.com/crypto-model-based-on-human-cardiorespiratory-coupling/105284
>> 
>> This is nonsense, right?
> 
> Yep.
> 
>> Unbounded in the sense of relying on secrecy of the unbounded number of 
>> algorithms?
> 
> The distinction between algorithm and parameter (along with other things) 
> seem muddled.
> 
> I commented on it is a few posts in sci.crypt.  Here are trimmed highlights.
> 
> Jeffrey Goldberg wrote in Message-ID:    <bqe4cnft6k...@mid.individual.net>:
> 
>> […]the 60 item bibliography of their paper cites only one source in 
>> cryptography (and that is on quantum key exchange).
>> 
>> Somehow the first sentence of the paper doesn't inspire confidence either:
>> 
>> "It is often the case that great scientific and technological discoveries 
>> are …"
>> 
>> […]
>> What I see as I glance over this paper is that people who have been caught 
>> up in the fadish understanding of "chaos theory" see that they get PRNGs out 
>> of their dynamical systems (true enough).
>> 
>> But quite emphatically, the PRNGs that you get from most of this non-linear 
>> dynamical systems are not cryptographically appropriate. Indeed, there are 
>> tests that can distinguish whether the random sequences is likely to be from 
>> such a system. If I understand correctly, even their noise filtering 
>> component depends on exactly that technology.
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> -j
> _______________________________________________
> cryptography mailing list
> cryptography@randombit.net
> http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography

_______________________________________________
cryptography mailing list
cryptography@randombit.net
http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography

Reply via email to