On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 01:02:14PM +0100, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) - lists wrote: > On 3/11/15 12:42 PM, stef wrote: > > against state level actors. i mean globaleaks clearly has state-level actors > > in their threat-model, right? > No, GlobaLeaks doesn't consider in it's threat model an NSA-like actor.
observe, how the question regarding "state-level" actors is dodged by reducing the set to "nsa-like" (what does that even mean?) and knowing the dutch, the hungarian and the serbian globaleaks users personally, i can assure you they are operating outside your threat-model, and i'm not sure they are aware of it. > Check the Threat Model link on https://globaleaks.org in the footer to > get a better insight. i now understand why you did not link this directly: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1niYFyEar1FUmStC03OidYAIfVJf18ErUFwSWCmWBhcA/pub seriously on google? your threatmodel seems indeed quite limited. you should be much more open about your limits. your actions and words to not instill trust in your product. -- otr fp: https://www.ctrlc.hu/~stef/otr.txt _______________________________________________ cryptography mailing list cryptography@randombit.net http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
