On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 01:08:48PM +0100, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) - lists wrote: > > you should be much more open about your limits. > Stef, don't troll! :-)
your debating style is cute, ad-hominems, generalisms, dodging of hard questions, lots of weasel words. not very convincing. what is less convincing, is for example the fact, that the magyarleaks guys for example run wordpress and other bugdoors on the same host as your globaleaks. while at the same time the local government has put them on a putin-like-ngo-blacklist, sends out the cops they usually send to football matchesto recover accounting documentation, and are a happy customer of your friends at hackingteam and finfischer.and your little js app is sitting in the middle of all this, while you waive your conscience away, luckily parallel construction will reduce chances of you ever having to admit responsibility. you can devise scrypt-based password schemes as much as you like, noone really cares about them, and people like greenwald will be happy to lose their heads while nodding and drooling to your crypto-porn, but it's useless it will be easily circumvented. i argue that leakers leak using mail and facebook does not actually create such a nice watering hole style attack surface as your shiny js app, hosted next to the wordpress of the journalists having no clue about such setups or their maintenance. even silkroad was busted, and those guys at least had some motivation, as it was their ass, not their sources ass that they wanted to protect. maybe you want to revisit my questions/statements also in previous and reconsider responding to them honestly to restore some respect and trust that you squandered so far. -- otr fp: https://www.ctrlc.hu/~stef/otr.txt _______________________________________________ cryptography mailing list cryptography@randombit.net http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
