On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, Harald Koch wrote: >How many images are posted to usenet every *day*, never mind the sheer >number of images stored on webservers everywhere. IANAS, but a mere one >million messages is too small a sample set to be statistically >significant. Actually, statistically significant sample sizes have more to do with the probability distribution than the sheer number of objects being analyzed. One million images has the same statistical significance whether it's one day of traffic or one year of traffic. Bear --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Stegdetect 0.4 released and results from USENET search ... Niels Provos
- Re: Stegdetect 0.4 released and results from USENE... John Gilmore
- Re: Stegdetect 0.4 released and results from U... P.J. Ponder
- Re: Stegdetect 0.4 released and results from U... Harald Koch
- Re: Stegdetect 0.4 released and results fr... Ray Dillinger
- Re: Stegdetect 0.4 released and results from USENE... Arnold G. Reinhold
- Re: Stegdetect 0.4 released and results from U... Karsten M. Self
- Re: Stegdetect 0.4 released and results from USENE... Niels Provos
- Re: Stegdetect 0.4 released and results from USENE... Niels Provos
- Re: Stegdetect 0.4 released and results from U... Arnold G. Reinhold
- RE: Stegdetect 0.4 released and results from USENE... Trei, Peter