I'd have to agree with Jim. I have some WW II military radios in my basement and they look pretty pristine on the inside. Military equipment is built for long shelf life. Even stuff that's seen a lot of service often cleans up nicely. Also the (unmet) minimum bid for the M-209 on Ebay was $3000. It's hard to see how someone could make a small quantity of something that mechanically complex and make much money selling them for $3000 each.

Arnold Reinhold


At 5:34 PM -1000 10/28/02, Jim Gillogly wrote:
Jay D. Dyson wrote:
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, Jeffrey I. Schiller wrote:
There's an M-209 for sale on EBay:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=726499988
Auction closes in about 4 hours and no one has bid...
Small wonder. The unit in question appears to have a distinct
lack of wear and no sign of degradation from regular use. Having worked
with U.S. military hardware (mid 1980s) that was from the Korean conflict
era, I can attest that *nothing* ever came our way that was that pristine. This in itself leads me to believe the item up for bid is a replica.
I'm not convinced by this argument -- but then I have a vested
interest in not being convinced. I have an apparently nearly identical
M-209-B, also unused before I got it. Since then I've encrypted a
couple of thousand characters on it; it works perfectly, and matches
the behavior of a real M-209. The story was that it was part
of a cache of surplus M-209's that were produced but never needed in
WW2, and they "turned up" decades later. I bought mine perhaps 10
years ago. The accessories were also in perfect condition: an extra
roll of tape, the ink and pad tubes, and the khaki carrying case.
The manual seemed to me convincing: the realistic WW2-style paper
was yellowed but unused, and the staples had rusted, suggesting
that it had been bound a good long time before I bought it.

I think mine is real, and by extension I have no reason to doubt
that the one on eBay is also real. Have you ever heard of anyone
making M-209 replicas? If you were going to that much trouble,
why not do it with Enigmas instead? They're much better known,
more secure (for what it's worth at that security level), and have
a much higher potential street value.

Jim Gillogly


---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to