Messages by Date
-
2002/11/03
Re: Windows 2000 declared secure
Jonathan S. Shapiro
-
2002/11/02
Re: Windows 2000 declared secure
Julien WILK
-
2002/11/02
Re: Windows 2000 declared secure
Adam Shostack
-
2002/11/02
Re: Windows 2000 declared secure
Jonathan S. Shapiro
-
2002/11/02
Re: Windows 2000 declared secure
Adam Shostack
-
2002/11/02
Re: Windows 2000 declared secure
Jonathan S. Shapiro
-
2002/11/02
Re: Windows 2000 declared secure
Jonathan S. Shapiro
-
2002/11/01
Re: Windows 2000 declared secure
Ron Luman II
-
2002/11/01
Re: Windows 2000 declared secure
Jim Hughes
-
2002/11/01
Re: patents
IanG
-
2002/11/01
Re: Windows 2000 declared secure
Mark Miller
-
2002/10/31
patents
R. A. Hettinga
-
2002/10/31
Re: Windows 2000 declared secure
ji
-
2002/10/31
Windows 2000 declared secure
Peter Gutmann
-
2002/10/30
Re: patent free(?) anonymous credential system pre-print
Adam Back
-
2002/10/30
Re: M-209 for sale on EBay
Arnold G. Reinhold
-
2002/10/30
Treacherous Computing Masterclass: London, November 7th
Seth Johnson
-
2002/10/29
patent free(?) anonymous credential system pre-print
R. A. Hettinga
-
2002/10/29
E-C Logix: current patent holder for the DigiCash patents?
R. A. Hettinga
-
2002/10/29
RSA Attacks? (was: Attacks on AES)
Martin F Krafft
-
2002/10/29
Attacks on AES
Martin F Krafft
-
2002/10/28
Re: M-209 for sale on EBay
Jim Gillogly
-
2002/10/28
Re: M-209 for sale?
Jim Hughes
-
2002/10/28
Re: M-209 for sale on EBay
Richard Johnson
-
2002/10/28
Re: M-209 for sale on EBay
Matt Crawford
-
2002/10/27
Re: M-209 for sale on EBay
Jeffrey I. Schiller
-
2002/10/27
M-209 for sale on EBay
Steve Bellovin
-
2002/10/25
Re: more snake oil? [WAS: New uncrackable(?) encryption technique]
Ed Gerck
-
2002/10/25
USDOD Stego Solicitation
reusch
-
2002/10/25
Re: more snake oil? [WAS: New uncrackable(?) encryption technique]
bear
-
2002/10/25
Re: more snake oil? [WAS: New uncrackable(?) encryption technique]
Nicko van Someren
-
2002/10/25
more snake oil? [WAS: New uncrackable(?) encryption technique]
Udhay Shankar N
-
2002/10/24
Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?
Ed Gerck
-
2002/10/24
Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?
Ed Gerck
-
2002/10/24
collision resistance -- Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?
Ed Gerck
-
2002/10/24
Re: collision resistance -- Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?
David Wagner
-
2002/10/24
Re: collision resistance -- Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?
Ed Gerck
-
2002/10/24
Re: comparing RMAC to AES+CBC-MAC or XCBC (Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?)
Adam Back
-
2002/10/24
STORK CRYPTOGRAPHY WORKSHOP: preliminary program
Antoon Bosselaers
-
2002/10/24
Re: comparing RMAC to AES+CBC-MAC or XCBC (Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?)
Sidney Markowitz
-
2002/10/24
Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?
David Wagner
-
2002/10/24
Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?
Ed Gerck
-
2002/10/23
Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?
Ed Gerck
-
2002/10/23
Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?
David Wagner
-
2002/10/23
Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?
Wei Dai
-
2002/10/23
Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?
Ed Gerck
-
2002/10/23
Re: comparing RMAC to AES+CBC-MAC or XCBC (Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?)
Adam Back
-
2002/10/23
Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?
Wei Dai
-
2002/10/23
Re: comparing RMAC to AES+CBC-MAC or XCBC (Re: Why is RMAC resistantto birthday attacks?)
Jack Lloyd
-
2002/10/23
Draft NIST Special Publication 800-38B available for public comment
Morris Dworkin
-
2002/10/23
Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?
bear
-
2002/10/22
Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?
Sidney Markowitz
-
2002/10/22
Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?
Ed Gerck
-
2002/10/22
Re: comparing RMAC to AES+CBC-MAC or XCBC (Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?)
Sidney Markowitz
-
2002/10/22
Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?
Greg Rose
-
2002/10/22
Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?
Sidney Markowitz
-
2002/10/22
Re: Palladium -- trivially weak in hw but "secure in software"?? (Re: palladium presentation - anyone going?)
Tal Garfinkel
-
2002/10/22
Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?
Ed Gerck
-
2002/10/22
comparing RMAC to AES+CBC-MAC or XCBC (Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?)
Adam Back
-
2002/10/22
Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?
Ed Gerck
-
2002/10/22
Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?
Sidney Markowitz
-
2002/10/22
Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?
Wei Dai
-
2002/10/22
Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?
Ed Gerck
-
2002/10/22
Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?
Sidney Markowitz
-
2002/10/22
Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?
Ed Gerck
-
2002/10/22
Re: Palladium -- trivially weak in hw but "secure in software"??(Re: palladium presentation - anyone going?)
Arnold G. Reinhold
-
2002/10/22
Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?
Victor.Duchovni
-
2002/10/22
Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?
Ed Gerck
-
2002/10/22
Re: Palladium -- trivially weak in hw but "secure in software"??(Re: palladium presentation - anyone going?)
alan
-
2002/10/22
Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?
Wei Dai
-
2002/10/22
Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?
Ed Gerck
-
2002/10/22
Re: Palladium -- trivially weak in hw but "secure in software"?? (Re: palladium presentation - anyone going?)
Rick Wash
-
2002/10/22
Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?
Sidney Markowitz
-
2002/10/22
Re: Palladium -- trivially weak in hw but "secure in software"??(Re: palladium presentation - anyone going?)
alan
-
2002/10/22
Re: Palladium -- trivially weak in hw but "secure in software"?? (Re: palladium presentation - anyone going?)
Nelson Minar
-
2002/10/22
Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?
bear
-
2002/10/22
Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?
Ed Gerck
-
2002/10/22
Palladium -- trivially weak in hw but "secure in software"?? (Re: palladium presentation - anyone going?)
Adam Back
-
2002/10/22
Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?
Victor.Duchovni
-
2002/10/21
Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?
Aram Perez
-
2002/10/21
Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?
Adam Back
-
2002/10/21
Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?
Victor.Duchovni
-
2002/10/21
Re: palladium presentation - anyone going?
Arnold G. Reinhold
-
2002/10/21
Palladium
Peter Clay
-
2002/10/21
Re: palladium presentation - anyone going?
Adam Back
-
2002/10/20
Re: palladium presentation - anyone going?
Arnold G. Reinhold
-
2002/10/19
2003 PKI Research Workshop CFP
Carl Ellison
-
2002/10/18
Re: QuizID?
Adam Fields
-
2002/10/18
Wired on Lucky's palladium patents...
Perry E. Metzger
-
2002/10/18
Re: QuizID?
bear
-
2002/10/17
palladium presentation - anyone going?
Adam Back
-
2002/10/17
Re: QuizID?
Rich Salz
-
2002/10/17
Re: QuizID?
Nicko van Someren
-
2002/10/17
Re: QuizID?
Adam Shostack
-
2002/10/17
RE: QuizID?
Trei, Peter
-
2002/10/17
QuizID?
Marc Branchaud
-
2002/10/16
ANNOUNCE: PureTLS version 0.9b3
Eric Rescorla
-
2002/10/16
[IP] Former FBI chief takes on encryption
Perry E. Metzger
-
2002/10/16
Re: [Bruce Schneier <schneier@counterpane.com>] CRYPTO-GRAM, October 15, 2002
Sidney Markowitz
-
2002/10/16
Re: [Bruce Schneier <schneier@counterpane.com>] CRYPTO-GRAM, October15, 2002
Pete Chown
-
2002/10/16
RE: [Bruce Schneier <schneier@counterpane.com>] CRYPTO-GRAM, October 15, 2002
Dean, James
-
2002/10/16
Re: [Bruce Schneier <schneier@counterpane.com>] CRYPTO-GRAM, October 15, 2002
Greg Rose
-
2002/10/16
Re: [Bruce Schneier <schneier@counterpane.com>] CRYPTO-GRAM,October 15, 2002
Bill Frantz
-
2002/10/15
[Bruce Schneier <schneier@counterpane.com>] CRYPTO-GRAM, October 15, 2002
Perry E. Metzger
-
2002/10/15
Crypto in court Friday
Russell Nelson
-
2002/10/15
Re: Microsoft marries RSA Security to Windows
Ed Gerck
-
2002/10/15
Re: Microsoft marries RSA Security to Windows
Arnold G. Reinhold
-
2002/10/15
Digital Identity Forum programme
R. A. Hettinga
-
2002/10/15
Input requested for second edition of "Firewalls and Internet Security"
Steve Bellovin
-
2002/10/15
Re: open source CAs?
Joris Ballet
-
2002/10/15
Re: Microsoft marries RSA Security to Windows
bear
-
2002/10/15
Re: Microsoft marries RSA Security to Windows
Ed Gerck
-
2002/10/15
Re: Microsoft marries RSA Security to Windows
Arnold G. Reinhold
-
2002/10/15
Re: open source CAs?
Stefan Kelm
-
2002/10/15
US DOD Crypto related SBIRS
reusch
-
2002/10/10
CFP -- IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy
Steve Bellovin
-
2002/10/10
Re: open source CAs?
Henrik Andreasson
-
2002/10/10
Re: Microsoft marries RSA Security to Windows
Ed Gerck
-
2002/10/10
Re: open source CAs?
Derek Atkins
-
2002/10/10
RE: open source CAs?
Graeme . Burnett
-
2002/10/10
Re: Microsoft marries RSA Security to Windows
Dan Riley
-
2002/10/10
Re: Microsoft marries RSA Security to Windows
Roy M. Silvernail
-
2002/10/10
Re: Microsoft marries RSA Security to Windows
Joseph Ashwood
-
2002/10/10
Re: open source CAs?
Michael H. Warfield
-
2002/10/10
Re: open source CAs?
Stefan Mink
-
2002/10/10
Re: open source CAs?
Leif Johansson
-
2002/10/10
Mitnick starts security company
R. A. Hettinga
-
2002/10/10
CFP: Security in Distributed Computing Special Track of PODC 2003
Amir Herzberg
-
2002/10/09
open source CAs?
Perry E. Metzger
-
2002/10/09
Re: Microsoft marries RSA Security to Windows
Roy M . Silvernail
-
2002/10/08
Microsoft marries RSA Security to Windows
R. A. Hettinga
-
2002/10/07
[OT Canute] Re: [LINK] [Fwd: Interesting KPMG report on DRM]
Trei, Peter
-
2002/10/07
Proofs of security
R. A. Hettinga
-
2002/10/07
Re: [LINK] [Fwd: Interesting KPMG report on DRM]
Robin Whittle
-
2002/10/06
Interesting KPMG report on DRM
Peter Gutmann
-
2002/10/05
Net Security Interview with Jon Callas
R. A. Hettinga
-
2002/10/05
Re: The 3rd Annual Consult Hyperion Digital Identity Forum
David G.W. Birch
-
2002/10/05
Re: Gaelic Code Talkers
Bill Stewart
-
2002/10/05
RE: JYA ping
R. A. Hettinga
-
2002/10/04
new copyright bill...
Perry E. Metzger
-
2002/10/04
cryptome.org
Loughry, Joe
-
2002/10/03
Confidentiality as a goal of old telegraph codes
Steve Bellovin
-
2002/10/03
Re: The 3rd Annual Consult Hyperion Digital Identity Forum
R. A. Hettinga
-
2002/10/03
RE: JYA ping
R. A. Hettinga
-
2002/10/03
Re: Gaelic Code Talkers
John Kelsey
-
2002/10/03
Re: What email encryption is actually in use?
Jeremey Barrett
-
2002/10/03
RE: What email encryption is actually in use?
Udhay Shankar N
-
2002/10/03
Re: Gaelic Code Talkers
bear
-
2002/10/03
Re: What email encryption is actually in use?
bear
-
2002/10/03
The 3rd Annual Consult Hyperion Digital Identity Forum
R. A. Hettinga
-
2002/10/03
[dgc.chat] New Release of NeuDist
R. A. Hettinga
-
2002/10/03
JYA ping
R. A. Hettinga
-
2002/10/03
Quantum cryptography takes to the skies
Udhay Shankar N
-
2002/10/03
RE: What email encryption is actually in use?
Lucky Green
-
2002/10/02
Re: What email encryption is actually in use?
RL 'Bob' Morgan
-
2002/10/02
Re: What email encryption is actually in use?
Simon Josefsson
-
2002/10/02
Re: Optical analog computing?
David Honig
-
2002/10/02
Gaelic Code Talkers
Bill Frantz
-
2002/10/02
Re: What email encryption is actually in use?
Ben Laurie
-
2002/10/02
Re: What email encryption is actually in use?
Adam Shostack
-
2002/10/02
Re: Optical analog computing?
Steven M. Bellovin
-
2002/10/02
Re: What email encryption is actually in use?
Steven M. Bellovin
-
2002/10/02
Re: What email encryption is actually in use?
John Saylor
-
2002/10/02
Re: What email encryption is actually in use?
Paul Krumviede
-
2002/10/02
Re: What email encryption is actually in use?
Jeremey Barrett
-
2002/10/02
Re: Optical analog computing?
Greg Rose
-
2002/10/02
Re: What email encryption is actually in use?
Jeremey Barrett
-
2002/10/02
Re: What email encryption is actually in use?
Udhay Shankar N
-
2002/10/02
ECHELON news
Udhay Shankar N
-
2002/10/02
Re: What email encryption is actually in use?
Matthew Byng-Maddick
-
2002/10/02
Re: What email encryption is actually in use?
Jeremey Barrett
-
2002/10/02
VeriSign Sells CALEA-Ware to Arrival, Cellular Mobile Systems,and First Cellular
R. A. Hettinga
-
2002/10/02
Re: What email encryption is actually in use?
Bill Stewart
-
2002/10/02
Re: Optical analog computing?
John S. Denker
-
2002/10/01
Optical analog computing?
R. A. Hettinga
-
2002/10/01
Re: Real-world steganography
Bill Stewart
-
2002/10/01
Re: Real-world steganography
Sampo Syreeni
-
2002/10/01
Re: Real-world steganography
Ben Laurie
-
2002/10/01
Cryptome
Carsten Kuckuk
-
2002/10/01
Re: Real-world steganography
Bram Cohen
-
2002/10/01
Operation RoadDevil: Secret Service probes wireless networks inWashington
R. A. Hettinga
-
2002/10/01
Re: Real-world steganography
Paul Krumviede
-
2002/10/01
Re: Real-world steganography
Jeremey Barrett
-
2002/09/30
Re: Real-world steganography
Adam Shostack
-
2002/09/30
Re: Real-world steganography
Paul Krumviede
-
2002/09/30
Real-world steganography
Peter Gutmann
-
2002/09/30
Re: RSA's RC5-64 Secret Key Challenge has been solved.
Bill Stewart
-
2002/09/27
Re: [SIMSOFT] machine shop -Biometrics Slouches Toward the Mainstream
David Honig
-
2002/09/27
Re: RSA's RC5-64 Secret Key Challenge has been solved.
Greg Rose
-
2002/09/27
RE: RSA's RC5-64 Secret Key Challenge has been solved.
Peter Clay
-
2002/09/27
RE: RSA's RC5-64 Secret Key Challenge has been solved.
Trei, Peter
-
2002/09/27
Re: RSA's RC5-64 Secret Key Challenge has been solved.
Ralf-P. Weinmann
-
2002/09/27
RE: RSA's RC5-64 Secret Key Challenge has been solved.
Lucky Green
-
2002/09/26
Re: RSA's RC5-64 Secret Key Challenge has been solved.
John Gilmore
-
2002/09/26
Re: [SIMSOFT] machine shop -Biometrics Slouches Toward theMainstream
Bill Frantz
-
2002/09/26
[SIMSOFT] machine shop -Biometrics Slouches Toward the Mainstream
R. A. Hettinga
-
2002/09/26
RSA's RC5-64 Secret Key Challenge has been solved.
Trei, Peter
-
2002/09/26
Re: unforgeable optical tokens?
John Kelsey
-
2002/09/26
Re: unforgeable optical tokens?
John Kelsey
-
2002/09/25
[CYBERIA] Call for Chapters for book series
R. A. Hettinga
[Earlier messages] [Later messages]