On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 7:05 AM, Mobile Mouse wrote: > Considering that cmake builds are quite difficult to adjust beyond the > narrow range the script writer prepared for - I strongly oppose moving > crypto++ to cmake.
Oh, my bad. I would not recommend a move to it. But I think it would be good to offer users a choice. Those who like Make can continue to use it. Those who like Cmake can use it (its Its just one text file, as I understand it). Jeff -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ Users" Google Group. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected]. More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at http://www.cryptopp.com. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Crypto++ Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
