> On Jun 29, 2015, at 7:27 , Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 7:05 AM, Mobile Mouse wrote: > > Considering that cmake builds are quite difficult to adjust beyond the > > narrow range the script writer prepared for - I strongly oppose moving > > crypto++ to cmake. > > Oh, my bad. I would not recommend a move to it.
Good! :-) > But I think it would be good to offer users a choice. Those who like Make can > continue to use it. Those who like Cmake can use it (its Its just one text > file, as I understand it). I believe that normally a person should have enough rope to hang himself, if that’s his choice. But adding Cmake capability is likely to negatively affect the rest of the distro. Also, do you find so much free time on your hands that you need to fill it with taking upon yourself maintenance of Cmake part of crypto++? I oppose adding Cmake support. I have it in one of my projects at work, and it’s nothing short of nightmare. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ Users" Google Group. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected]. More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at http://www.cryptopp.com. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Crypto++ Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
