SVN merges are painful to track and it takes time which some don't have.

The merge issue will change when moved to git.

Regards

Phil


On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 16:07 +0100, Geert Janssens wrote:
> Actually this kind of measures show the weakness of svn merging. It's pretty 
> hard to track merges in svn.
> 
> I saw a migration to git on your roadmap as well. I would suggest you re-
> evaluate this merge restriction at that time. Git merges are more powerful 
> and 
> easier to track.
> 
> In general, though I don't think merging outside of the revision control 
> system is a good idea. Not that my vote should matter much, I'm just 
> passively 
> following the CS project out of interest.
> 
> Geert
> 
> On vrijdag 25 november 2011, Jorrit Tyberghein wrote:
> > Mike, this isn't about getting rid of branches. This is about how branches
> > should be merged
> > according to Phil. Instead of letting svn take care of the merging
> > (svnmerge script) he proposes
> > to merge manually (using a diff) so that you get a proper diff in trunk.
> > 
> > I don't know if this is a good idea or not. Just clarifying what Phil
> > really means.
> > 
> > Greetings,
> > 
> > On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Mike Gist <xor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 25 November 2011 14:11, Philip Wyett <philswy...@gmx.co.uk> wrote:
> > >> Merges into trunk cause much hassle and tracking. Many want to see
> > > 
> > > changes into trunk as a diff not a merge and not go here and there to
> > > 
> > >> find the diff. Trunk should be pure code. If a dev cannot diff there own
> > >> tree and commit with an explanation, they should not be a dev.
> > > 
> > > I don't want to read through a 10k line diff. I want to see commits on
> > > new features as they happen.
> > > I also don't want trunk broken. Branches work great for me, plus all our
> > > GSoC students work in a branch.
> > > There's no way I'm going to have them sending me diffs every day which I
> > > then have to patch on my local copy. It's a waste of time.
> > > 
> > > --
> > > - Mike
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > ----- All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
> > > contains a definitive record of customers, application performance,
> > > security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this
> > > data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
> > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Crystal-develop mailing list
> > > crystal-deve...@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/crystal-develop
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure 
> contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, 
> security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this 
> data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
> _______________________________________________
> Crystal-main mailing list
> Crystal-main@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/crystal-main
> Unsubscribe: 
> mailto:crystal-main-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure 
contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, 
security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this 
data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
_______________________________________________
Crystal-main mailing list
Crystal-main@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/crystal-main
Unsubscribe: 
mailto:crystal-main-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to