This was intentional as we do not want subscriber keys to be exported from the 
HSM. We discussed this in one of our meetings. Only one CA had pushback, but 
after checking agreed with the direction.


Thanks, Bruce.

From: Faisal Razzak <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2023 4:28 PM
To: Bruce Morton <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Cscwg-public] Ballot CSC-21: Signing Service Update

Good Day everyone, Reading the modified changes for Code Signing Baseline 
Requirements at: https: //github. 
com/cabforum/code-signing/compare/93ee9976cdc4e1104952146e3556800459694874. . 
701d195fa95fe49e8a02435fc40fb0a018686866 . Line number 1380

Good Day everyone,

Reading the modified changes for Code Signing Baseline Requirements 
at:https://github.com/cabforum/code-signing/compare/93ee9976cdc4e1104952146e3556800459694874..701d195fa95fe49e8a02435fc40fb0a018686866<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/cabforum/code-signing/compare/93ee9976cdc4e1104952146e3556800459694874..701d195fa95fe49e8a02435fc40fb0a018686866__;!!FJ-Y8qCqXTj2!ai_SiHTiSodTE_VWwZi8Z8QT_M2lCkP6nJYlFupqIB2vMo07Rcbx2E0bKw4GyZ1-pOj0h-PvD9Z5okpQ_IY$>
 . Line number 1380 now mentions FIPS 140-2 Level 3. Is it an intentional 
change or typo from the earlier requirement for using FIPS 140-2 Level 2 for 
Subscriber Private Key associated with Code Signing Certificates?

Thank you,

Regards,
Faisal Razzak

E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY CLAUSE:
This e-mail and the information contained in it is confidential, may be 
privileged and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any other 
person is strictly prohibited from using, disclosing, distributing or 
reproducing it. If you have received this communication in error, please reply 
by e-mail to the sender and delete or destroy all copies of this message.
CLAUSE DE CONFIDENTIALITÉ POUR LES ENVOIS PAR COURRIEL
Le présent courriel et les renseignements qu'il contient sont confidentiels, 
peuvent être protégés par le secret professionnel et sont à l'usage exclusif du 
(des) destinataire(s) susmentionné(s). Toute autre personne est par les 
présentes avisée qu'illui est strictement interdit d'en faire l'utilisation, la 
diffusion, la distribution ou la reproduction. Si cette transmission vous est 
arrivée par erreur, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par courriel, 
puis effacer ou détruire toutes les copiesdu présent message.




On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 3:59 PM Bruce Morton via Cscwg-public 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Purpose of the Ballot
This ballot updates the “Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management 
of Publicly‐Trusted Code Signing Certificates“ version 3.4 in order to clarify 
language regarding Signing Service and signing requests. The main goals of this 
ballot are to:

  1.  Clarify the Signing Service definition and the expected deployment model.
  2.  Remove requirements for signing request.
  3.  Change text so Signing Service is not categorized as a Delegated Third 
Party.
  4.  Not allow Signing Service to transport Private Key to Subscriber.
  5.  Ensure Network Security Requirements are applicable to Signing Service.
  6.  State audit requirements for Signing Service.
The following motion has been proposed by Bruce Morton of Entrust and endorsed 
by Tim Hollebeek of DigiCert and Ian McMillan.


MOTION BEGINS

This ballot updates the “Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management 
of Publicly‐Trusted Code Signing Certificates” ("Code Signing Baseline 
Requirements") based on version 3.4. MODIFY the Code Signing Baseline 
Requirements as specified in the following redline: 
https://github.com/cabforum/code-signing/compare/93ee9976cdc4e1104952146e3556800459694874..701d195fa95fe49e8a02435fc40fb0a018686866<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/cabforum/code-signing/compare/93ee9976cdc4e1104952146e3556800459694874..701d195fa95fe49e8a02435fc40fb0a018686866__;!!FJ-Y8qCqXTj2!ai_SiHTiSodTE_VWwZi8Z8QT_M2lCkP6nJYlFupqIB2vMo07Rcbx2E0bKw4GyZ1-pOj0h-PvD9Z5okpQ_IY$>


MOTION ENDS
The procedure for this ballot is as follows: Discussion (7 days)


•                 Start Time: 2023-10-12 20:00 UTC

•                 End Time: Not before 2023-10-19 20:00 UTC

Vote for approval (7 days)


•                 Start Time: TBD

•                End Time: TBD
_______________________________________________
Cscwg-public mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/cscwg-public<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/cscwg-public__;!!FJ-Y8qCqXTj2!bHPUMRfbHlgaBBihKcnoSbtmIgAwnbK7NmFy47vTtgtRYCwQu0K_tDVCJEY3FxsRYu66SiUm3nS6wLDll_YPM3w$>
Any email and files/attachments transmitted with it are intended solely for the 
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If this message has 
been sent to you in error, you must not copy, distribute or disclose of the 
information it contains. Please notify Entrust immediately and delete the 
message from your system.
_______________________________________________
Cscwg-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/cscwg-public

Reply via email to