if it's an IE (only) hack, should it be escaped for IE (only)?
On 6/3/05, Ingo Chao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lea Anna Davis schrieb:
> > Adding the code #menu a:hover {background:1%;} worked! How bizarre. I
> > have no idea why IE needs to have this code.
>
> background:1%; tries to position a background-image (no matter if there
> is one or not) and reminds IE to do something: redraw all possible
> affected elements.
> Any background change on hover does this trick. This 1% has no sense at
> all. It's short, does not harm (mostly) the layout, and everybody knows
> instantly that this must be a hack, that's all.
>
> Ingo
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
