>I wouln't worry too much about Netscape...cover the big ones (IE, firefox, >opera, safari).
What about AOL. Isn't it's internal browser based on Netscape. And then there is it's new external browser based on IE. Does anyone know if it will do a better job of supporting CSS than IE? I can understand Angela's frustration. I feel it too. I was very excited about CSS when I first started using it, but poor browser support has really dampened my spirits. I'm not really a web designer, I'm a web application programmer. The html pages I code are generally pretty simple and usually contain few or no graphics. They often contain tables, not for design, but because I am dealing with tabular data. Yet I've spent days trying to get a few simple things to work the way I want them to in the presentation layer. And even then it's not ideal because IE doesn't support hover except on anchor tags. As a programmer, I can pick up a new language quickly, if it is well designed, because it is internally consistent in the way it handles things. CSS is not consistent - for example, the box model is not implemented the same on different types of elements. Coding is largely experimental and requires all sorts of ugly hacks and/or compromises. I have persisted, because I love what it is attempting to do, but it is clearly not a mature technology (more like a baby technology). And I wonder if the new browser wars will make things better or worse. Linda H ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
