I am almost done with a table-based > XHTML/CSS redesign of my parish web site.
www.allsaintsofamerica.org/new_site/index.html My CSS validates, but there are tons of warnings. I feel unsettled not correcting them, sort of like getting marks off by a teacher, but I honestly don't see the benefit of correcting many of them, and would like to ask the experts what the balance of risks and benefits is. First, many of them are that I specified a background color but no text color, or the reverse. My reluctance in correcting this is that some of my present rules "work" with a foreground color in contexts of two different background colors. Or vice versa: different background colors all of which work fine with a black text color. To correct this will require the addition of several additional lines of code that to this beginner, anyway, seem unnecessary. Second, there are several that say something like, "Redefinition of padding-left : #navlist a", and I honestly don't know what they mean. The CSS (at the moment) is here: www.allsaintsofamerica.org/new_site/css/allsaints.css Are these things that could pose risks in some way, and I should correct them, or are these things that I can ignore, and correcting which will only add unnecessary lines to my CSS? Thanks! Charles ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/