Zoe M. Gillenwater wrote: > Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: >> I still prefer to build two and three (and whatever) column layouts >> based on this... >> <http://www.alistapart.com/articles/negativemargins/> ...but maybe >> that's just me ;-)
> It's certainly not just you! :-) Very popular layout method. > > I prefer a flipped around version of the negative margin approach > that avoids IE's tendency to drop floats when large content is thrown > in the mix. The "flip" is a real improvement :-) I think I'm using a /slightly/ similar method with both positive and negative margins on floats, and some paddings and/or borders to go with it. It's still having Brill's method as base, but I've flipped it around so many times that even IE gets dizzy, so I won't recommend such a "flip-flop" for anyone but the most steady (or suicidal) web designers. No float-drop in IE though... <http://www.gunlaug.no/contents/molly_1_06.html> ...but that may be entirely accidental ;-) regards Georg -- http://www.gunlaug.no ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
