Glenn E. Lanier, II wrote: >[...] >If you're still reading and not confused, let me try to sum it up: >http://www.CarpentersForChrist.com/LayerTest/reg.html >contains valid HTML > > ... Oho! I was still reading but also confused, while I did check the html-validator in the meantime. If this is the proper link, which validator u are using? ;-) http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.carpentersforchrist.com%2FLayerTest%2Freg.html <http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.carpentersforchrist.com%2FLayerTest%2Freg.html> Result: Failed validation, 107 errors > and some IE-only inline style properties ...
>and the proper layout (submit button above instructions, above processing >message). >http://www.CarpentersForChrist.com/LayerTest/reg1.html >contains essentially the same code, > > .... but no IE-only style codes (for this one is valid html) > so maybe IE is interpreting "essentially the same code" on it's own IE-way. >but doesn't display correctly (submit button is >to the left of instructions and processing message). > > To get the difference, I should advise to isolate the problem by commenting out parts of the (overwhelming table-) code you got, see where the css is going wrong, and correct IE in that place(s). Greetings, francky ps-1: the css-validator can be made happy by replacing the 3 IE_underscore hacks by a conditional comment. ps-2: beautyful css-hovers instead of the html-absorbing js-hovers should be some good work too. :-) ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
