Audra Coldiron wrote:
> http://designerkarma.com
> [...] They are all totally necessary to have nearly complete design
> flexibility while working with the same skeleton.
I'll say a 'conditional yes' to that - given the current standards, but
are those inline styles necessary too?
> I've often thought we'd get the same people saying the same thing
> about our system... that is, until they use it and see the utility of
> it ;-)
Pity it doesn't survive when properly served, as 'application/xhtml+xml'...
( XML parsing failed: syntax error (Line: 114, Character: 44) )
Might have been more useful then, and in accordance with XHTML 1.0
standard. Shouldn't be too difficult to achieve.
regards
Georg
--
http://www.gunlaug.no
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
