Micky Hulse wrote: > Micky Hulse wrote: >> Lol, what are your thoughts? Should I be worried about this, or can I go >> as small as needed for optimal file size? :) > > To be a little more on topic, I am just wondering if there are > restrictions and/or problems when it comes to using small bitmaps (in > width/height) as CSS background tiles? > > Is it better to tile (via CSS) a 20px wide/30px tall background vs. > tiling a 1px wide/30px tall background? Hrmmm. I guess this could go OT > for the list... If so, sorry in advance... Pleas email off-list if > answer has nothing to do with how CSS interacts with the said image. >
The rendering of a 2x2 px PNG (tiled, bg-image on the html element) in IE7 may take 10 seconds or more. Some users may find this inacceptable. I'd use 100x100px at minimum. Ingo -- http://www.satzansatz.de/css.html ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
