>>do you think table-based layouts still need to be used for some particular layouts?<<
Not really. >>In other words, can pure CSS layouts do everything a table-based layout can do?<< Yes, save a single exception :) I haven't done a table-based layout in a looooooong time. Haven't needed to, because I've only found *one* layout - and it was a hypothetical one - that I can't currently make work with CSS. No one's ever actually *needed* it done, and I've never seen one used, but I could see it *possibly* being needed, and as of right now, I've been unable to successfully pull it off. I'm not an expert like many of these guys on the list, so they may scoff at my ineptitude, but for me, this is the only exception I've ever had. It's a 5 column nested layout, 100% width, with 2 headers and a sticky footer. Oh, and every column/row has to have a different background color without using "faux columns". In other words, a header; a footer that stays at the bottom of the screen (unless the content pushes it down); a left, and right sidebar. The main content - in the center - has to have a nested header with a left and right sidebar, content in the middle. 100% width and height. I haven't been able to pull this one off yet. I've come *really* close. but so far, this is the *only* exception I've found. ~Shelly ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
