Phoebe Taylor wrote
> If you guys wouldn't mind, could I get a site check on this? > > http://www.cgraytaylor.net > > It seems to check out okay for me in Firefox, IE 7, and Opera. I had > to lower the font size in the gallery photo descriptions for Opera to > lay out the text correctly which makes it a touch small for my tastes, > but is better than having orphan words. It's my first CSS site, so > some critiques would be much appreciated. > Phoebe: Welcome to CSS! I am using Win XP Home SP2. Very pleasing intial impression. FF2.0 looks good except for text growing out the bottom, per David Laakso. O9.26 looks good. Avant 11.5 looks good. IE8 beta looks good. Your fixed pixel fonts don't scale in IE/Avant. Personally, I would lose the "Best viewed in....or greater resolution" That should be a user decision. An orphan </a> tag is causing a few minor errors, per the W3C validator. Keep up the good work. Best Regards, Peter Hyde-Smith www.fatpawdesign.com ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
