On 2008/03/09 17:09 (GMT-0500) Phoebe Taylor apparently typed:
> In general, using the shorthand in my code has been a good thing, but
> seems to be conditional too. Like trying to put bold in the { font:
> 125% #000 bold } seems to make the text less bold than it is if it is
> on a tag line by itself, like { font-style: bold; } I'm not sure
> why this is.
The positions of the possible values for font shorthand are not optional:
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/fonts.html#font-shorthand
--
"Let us not love with words or in talk only.
Let us love by what we do." 1 John 3:18 NLV
Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409
Felix Miata *** http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
