Ray Leventhal wrote: > David, > > Thanks for your reply. The URL I gave above was changed to remove the > image which was causing the issue. The test case is at > http://www.sunbuild.biz/indextest.php > > However, I like the idea of setting the fixed width, but am uncertain if > a) it should be set on #container and b) if doing that will limit the > scalability of the site when under font-resizing stress. > > I welcome your thoughts, > > -Ray > >
It should be set on the #container. /I am not pushing fixed width/: or, min/max width. It was simply a fast and dirty suggestion. On the other hand, with some minor adjustment of elements, it will scale fine at 980. And it will avoid the extraordinary wide line measure those at 1680 and higher get with the page at its current width of 75%. Setting an 800 min-width/1280 max-width/ might work too-- providing you are willing to cope with and use the appropriate work around for support of min/max to IE/6. Maybe you should leave well enough alone...? -- http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
