I believe you must be some kind of genius! :-) Your "rough" corrections always bring things right into line. Not sure how you do it so quickly. But thanks.
In your opinion is there another solution to this design that would work better? Not asking for you to do the development, but rather to point me in a better direction if it exists. What I liked about this framework that I found online was: fixed width left column - though I'd prefer the source order to be AFTER the main content elastic main content area min and max width for overall dimensions Things really started getting messy, though, when I started applying the rounded corners, shadow borders, etc. to the basic page. Messy enough that I don't really understand what some of the CSS code does. Actually that was somewhat true of even the basic framework page. This is going to be one of probably 3 template files which will drive our new site, so I do want it to be as easy to work with and flexible as possible. Thus, if a better method is possible I'd love to pursue that. Thanks again for your help with this. Chris On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Gunlaug Sørtun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Chris Akins wrote: > >> http://www.springfieldmo.gov/newSite/perfectFluid2col.html > > IE6 has severe stacking and 'hasLayout'-related problems with that > design. See if this rough CSS correction fits the bill... > > <http://www.gunlaug.no/tos/alien/ca/test_08_0820.html> > <http://www.gunlaug.no/tos/alien/ca/test_08_0820_files/perfectS.css> > > ...and extract the parts you need. > > regards > Georg > -- > http://www.gunlaug.no > ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
