On Wed, 05 Nov 2008 14:13:35 -0700, Debbie Campbell wrote: > I'm using one of the footerstick methods (I forget which one I finally > decided to use - > this one is closest to the effect I want) and I'm having a problem in FF, > IE7, Safari > and Opera. This hasn't been checked in IE6 yet. > >> http://www.redkitecreative.com/projects/hixon/ >> > The footer's in the position I want it - with the top of it slicing under the > wrapper > at that exact place - but the bottom's unstuck. Can anyone provide some > direction? > > I tried the regular 'footerstick alt' method and that works fine, but I don't > want the > footer to ride up any higher than it is right now, if that makes sense.
I don't think you'll get any "FooterStick" CSS to deal with nested DIVS - not cross-browser, anyway. Those that I know of use a min-height of 100% on a single "non-footer" DIV to get the full height on short pages. While Opera and FF 3 will obey this 100% when pages are "zoomed" I have not had any success with IE 7. The entire page expands (except for a background image set on BODY). You have several fixed height elements there. Be aware that this is causing chaos at my end, as several of my browsers have minimum font size defined. With your base font size at 62.5% some browsers scale up all your text to this minimum, breaking your page just as surely as choosing a larger font size. You'll also find that many high-end laptops are set to 120 DPI - this makes text 25% larger than usual in both Opera and Internet Explorer. FWIW - I have been attempting a scripting solution for this case (of nested DIVs) and was not successful. So I have no suggestions. Sorry. Cordially, David -- ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
