On 19/01/2009, at 5:40 AM, Ron Koster wrote:
> At 11:31 AM 1/18/2009 -0500, Larry C. Lyons wrote: >> one of more important reasons is speed . >> >> CSS pages render about 1/3rd less time than table based layouts > > So instead of rendering in, say, 3 to 6 seconds (which, off the top > of my head, seems about average, for any average page on the 'net -- > at least on my computer), it'll only take a mere 2 to 4 seconds? > > Sorry, but I'm not sure how "important" a reason that is. > > Ron ;) > > Woof?... http://www.Psymon.com > Ach, du Leni!... http://www.Riefenstahl.org > Hmm... http://www.Imaginary-Friend.ca > Ask anyone not on a fast internet connection. Not everyone has the luxury (utility?) of high speed internet connections such as those most of us on this list enjoy. k...@mothership.co.nz +64 21 999 990 Mothership | mothership.co.nz ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
