David Hucklesby wrote: > On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:00:21 -0500, Ron Koster wrote: > >> At 10:02 AM 2/13/2009 -0800, David Hucklesby wrote: >> >>> I find that these percentages work best >>> cross-browser: 69%, 75%, 82%, 94% ... with a base font-size of 100%. >>> >>> > [...] > >> Firstly, from past threads, my understanding is that one shouldn't be going >> any smaller than 100% -- or at least should try not to -- if only to be in >> keeping with whatever it is that any particular user has set their own >> settings at, so wouldn't going as small as 69% (or whatever) be *too* small? >> >> > > For the main content, yes, I agree. But side notes, copyright notices, > and the "small print" I'd use the smaller sizes, although I avoid smaller > than 75% myself. >
Matters of opinion abound. Mine is: No need for anything below 90%. Cope with side notes, disclaimers, copyright, not as small print, but as a diminished value (as in black and white). As, for example, main content on #fff at #000, lessor content at #222, and even lessor content at #333. As ever, Helen PS Did I mention I am blind in one eye, and can't see out the other ;-) ? -- A thin red line and a salmon-color ampersand forthcoming. http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
