> Actually, you're doing quite well, Thanks. > regardless of your personal choice > for font-family :-) I see... http://virtuelvis.com/archives/2004/01/avoid-verdana
Well, if Unix distros don't have it by default. I must declare on the CSS Verdana alternatives. However, doing that, will cause visual imperfections do to the comparative size between a Verdana font and other fonts. Solution: Change the font. Argument against this: Who have Verdana installed however, get a much easy read font on screen. And most of people have it. ... To not kill this topic, I will ask this on another topic. > My second CSS layout was exactly like my first > CSS layout: upside down and backward. Lol, well, cannot compare: I have css-d. Besides maybe was that upside down that make you a CSS Master... And talking about upside downs.... > Check your page in SeaMonkey/1.1.17. Nooooo!!!! I get the same symptoms on Firefox 2. So the problem is that, on SeaMonkey 1.1.17, I'm unable to contain the float ? Should I apply a clear fix method, or a overflow:auto; method. But first of what I'd like to understand: What float is not contained? Any help? Regards, Márcio ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
