Yes, may "if it ain't broke, don't fix it". But to me, this site IS 'broken' - the coding is offensiely ugly. I'd certainly want to redo it if I had the chance, if only to ensure a little more beautiful coding in the world. Besides which, good coding simply works better - it loads faster and ranks higher in the search engines.
Val 2009/10/12 Brian M. Curran <br...@brianmcurran.com>: > Val, > Thanks for the reply. When I logged into the file manager there were many > image files, which I wasn't expecting, so I gave the designer the benefit in > writing this email to find if maybe it was done according to some acceptable > practice that I'm not familiar with. The text seemed to be in the alt tags > of the images, and I started parsing through the files, but then figured > that I'd shoot a quick email to the CSS list. > > I offered to make some updates to the text on the site as a favor, and had > intentions of toying around with the CSS while I was at it. Therefore in > regards to redoing the whole site, that would be great but I don't know if I > have the time to do that much unpaid work. Unfortunately, maybe if it ain't > broke, then don't fix it? > > Sincerely, > Brian > > --------------------------- www.oakleafcircle.org.uk www.valdobson.co.uk www.astrodiary.co.uk ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
