2010/2/1 Sander Sõnajalg <san...@zeroturnaround.com>
> hmm.. browsers do quite much to compensate for the more simple/common > mistakes in html like "<br>" or "<hr>" or > "<p><font color="red">babuhhh</p><font>", interpreting it in the way that > makes most sense, i guess..? but yes, eventually i plan to do the same sort > of reseach also for XHTML, and build a database of common-spread errors and > the ones with the heaviest impact on page's functionality/usability (as you > know there are hundreds of ways to write invalid stuff that browsers > compensate for themselves and nobody will ever even notice) > > but really, please, if anybody knows if there is some sort of a list of > faulty public real-world pages, i'd appreciate really if you let me know... > i've googled unsuccessfully for quite some time now. i just need something > to get me started with : ) in the end of the day i'll try to use > browser-shots etc. to find the incompatible sites automatically, but this > really takes some programming and i need some indication that i'm going in > the right direction before undertaking anything like that.. so, any ideas? > : )) > > thanks & cheers, > sander > > ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
