Chris F.A. Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Apr 2010, jeffrey morin wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Chris F.A. Johnson
>> <ch...@cfajohnson.com>wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, Kevin Rodenhofer wrote:
>>>
>>>> This mock up looks exactly the same in IE 7-8, Safari 4, Chrome 5 and
>>>> Firefox 3.6.3 (all on a PC).
>>>     No, it doesn't. It doesn't even look the same in FF if the
>>>    font-size is different: <http://cfajohnson.com/testing/form.jpg>.
>> Couldn't you technically declare your own font size in px and avoid this
>> issue of browser default font size? I am not saying it's a good idea to use
>> px based fonts, but it is doable and with the zoom functionality of newer
>> browsers you'd avoid breaking layouts.
> 
>    That doesn't take into account viewers whose default font size is
>    larger (using a minumum font size).

Or the fact that 16px on a 1024x768 display looks a lot bigger than 16px 
on a 1600x1440 display ...

>    I'm not going to zoom every time I come to a badly coded site, then
>    return to the real size for another site.

Sometimes I do, if I'm at the site to read information. If they're just 
trying to sell me something, I don't zoom: I go elsewhere.

-- 
David
gn...@hawaii.rr.com
authenticity, honesty, community
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Reply via email to