TriState Advantage, Kris Jacobson wrote:
> I still have a negative margin on the header ul but it works in IE6 & 8 and
> FF 3.63.
>
> I put the footer div into the content div as you suggested David but then the
> footer floated to the top. Adding more content would push it down but I do
> not think some of the pages will have the content to push it down. Adding
> positioning and bottom: 0 seemed to fix the problem.
>
On pages with short content you might consider assigning a body id and
padding-top on the footer for them?
markup
<body id="short">
css
body#short #footer {padding-top: whatever px you want;}
> I will see what happens when I get the page content added in.
> Again thanks so much for all the help. If anyone has time to check the page
> in other browsers it would be greatly appreciated.
>
> http://www.tristateadvantage.com/woolynpurses/index.html
>
>
> Kris J
>
>
Everything may work out fine for you just the way you have it. But, it
is always advantageous to keep in mind that not everyone in the universe
is a clone of you and that stress testing early-on in Web design is
important.
I am not able to check it in any version of IE at the moment.
You may want to check your page yourself in IE 6/7/8 at text-size
"largest."
Below is a screen-capture at +3 font-scaling in
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.4; en-US; rv:1.9.2.3)
Gecko/20100401 Firefox/3.6.3
<http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/cssd/tsa.png>
Best,
~d
--
desktop
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
