Hoyd Breton wrote:
> Thanks for all the pennies, nickels and dimes. Cashing it all in. = ] > > I wanted to avoid the SWF route, not because all the hoopla but more as an > exercise to learn the javascript ropes a bit. Good man : "Flash ? Just say 'NO !'" :-) > http://starkshumble.com/test/ I like it, in many ways, but I would like it even more if the slides overshot a little and then glided back. Think of the animation as an application of mass, spring and dashpot -- at the moment, it is critically damped, and I think it would be aæsthetically more pleasing if it were to err on the under-damped side. My two (real) penn'orth :-) Philip Taylor ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [[email protected]] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
