Chris Blake wrote:
> Yes, I am sure it's not w3c compliant at the moment but I > will look into that if I can get things working. It might be a bit > backwards but 6 errors isn't too many, Dear Chris -- With the greatest respect, one error is too many, not for reasons of pedantry but simply because you won't be able to "get things working" (other than by pure serendipity) all the while a single error remains. Start by addressing the errors, then (and only then) start worrying about "getting things working" : they may well work all by themselves once the errors are removed. ** Phil. ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
