At 3:08 PM -0400 8/12/10, David Laakso wrote: >Tom Livingston wrote: >> Just another thought: >> > > www.cloudfour.com/css-media-query-for-mobile-is-fools-gold/ > > >Do you have anymore happiness and good cheer that you might want to >bring to the table? > >~d
~d: I don't know about happiness and good cheer, but I don't agree with some of the article. For example, the article is states: "The idea of adding more code-adding more to download-in order to optimize for mobile should be the first clue that this isn't a good solution." I'm not sure why that would be true. The article fails to state that both download and processing speeds are improving and they are improving at a higher rate than demand. So planning for the future, or next week (as per Ethan Marcotte), which is what we all do, is not as bad as he makes it out to be. I think these types of discussions (Marcotte v Grigsby) are the real "give and take" in development. The rest of us just do the best we can until we know better. Cheers, tedd -- ------- http://sperling.com/ ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
