Alan Gresley wrote:
Property src doesn't exist :
url('../fonts/TitilliumText22L005-webfont.eot')
url('../fonts/TitilliumText22L005-webfont.eot')
Which is almost the same as you were seeking.
No it's not : it's totally different. What I am seeking
is a mention of this property "src" that does not exist,
not a quasi-random snippet of the CSS that (a) does not
contain "src", and (b) is once again repeated for no
apparent reason whatsoever.
But that is what it says.
Property src doesn't exist
Yes, but NOT (apologies for shouting) in the fragment that
it then echoes, and then -- for no apparent reason -- repeats.
I do believe the onus is on the author to use the correct level of CSS
for a correct report since CSS doesn't have a thing called a Doctype.
There may well be merit in that argument, but are beginning authors
such as Rory likely to be aware of which level of CSS they are
apparently trying to use, particularly when recycling code fragments
from other sites ?
Philip Taylor
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
