On 1/01/2011 12:26 AM, Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
So : I have simplified Rory's "all.css" down to the shortest
fragment than can generate a diagnostic from the validator :
@font-face
{
font-family:foo;
}
Here is what the validator says :
Property font-family doesn't exist in CSS level 2.1 but exists in :
foo foo
Would other CSS-D members agree that
(a) A diagnostic "Property X does not exist in CSS level Y
but exists in : " could reasonably be expected to continue by
citing the dialect(s) of CSS in which Property X /does/ exist ?
(b) The statement "Property X doesn't exist in CSS level Y
but exists in : foo foo" is completely wrong
(it does /not/ "exist" in "foo foo ") and would appear
to be the result of an error in the coding of the validator ?
Then this is what feedback you can give.
Take this string.
svg {opacity:0.5}
The report back is.
Property opacity doesn't exist in CSS level 2.1 but exists in : 0.5 0.5
A little over a week ago, it did say "but exists in CSS level 3"
--
Alan http://css-class.com/
Armies Cannot Stop An Idea Whose Time Has Come. - Victor Hugo
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [[email protected]]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
