On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Eric A. Meyer <e...@meyerweb.com> wrote: > At 6:50 AM -0700 1/19/11, Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh wrote: >> This may be off-topic in a CSS list. > Yes, it's off-topic for a CSS list. So, really, is arguing about whether > HTML5 is "ready to use" or not, or if it's useful or dangerous or misguided > or brilliant or whatever. > I don't mind discussions about ways to style (and challenges with styling) > the new HTML5 elements, of course. But arguing about the language itself is > off-topic here and should be avoided. Thank you.
I am a little late to the conversation, but I just thought I would point out (to my fellow CSS-d list members) that there is a decent HTML5 list here: <http://www.whatwg.org/mailing-list> Low traffic, but I thought it would be good to mention (I think it could use more peeps... Join up!) There is also an awesome web design list here: <http://www.webdesign-l.com/> Cheers, M ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/