I'll probably be throwing them up online for testing soon, and I know
I'll have issues/questions.
I'm going to flag your email to me so that I can alert you when
they're up, if that works.
J
On Aug 26, 2011, at 10:40 AM, Ted Rolle Jr. wrote:
John, would you be willing to post or e-mail them for study?
Ted
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Kevin A. Cameron
<kevinacame...@gmail.com> wrote:
Nice!
And thanks Tim for the clarification, I'll definitely be
incorporating that
syntax in future projects.
Kevin
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 6:06 PM, John <j...@coffeeonmars.com> wrote:
>
> On Aug 25, 2011, at 9:10 AM, Kevin A. Cameron wrote:
>
> +1 for the OOCSS mentality...Start with a base class that
defines the most
>> common use, then use additional classes in conjunction with the
base class
>> to define the variations.
>>
>
> this is working *very* well for me, both solving problems and
giving me
> flexibility at the same time.
>
> I re-named my styles improving their descriptiveness and with
CamelCase,
> the whole thing much easier to read and make sense of.
>
>
> John
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
