I would not be able to sleep tonight if I didn't bring up 'mobile first' again. It's been my experience with both methods, that it's easier to go from mobile up and usually requires less CSS. I've had some break point sheets with only a few lines of CSS. I usually only use min-width MQs.
Just a thought, since you are just starting. Might be a good time to try it. OK, I'll sleep better now. Good luck. On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 7:15 PM, John A. Johnson <j...@coffeeonmars.com> wrote: > > On Aug 29, 2013, at 4:11 PM, "Tom Livingston" <tom...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> If you use the right MQs, you can still do that. Same concept, different >> widths and adjustments. > > > OK, wait..the lightbulb just went off..you're saying, whatever the "starting > point" is, requires no MQ; only the breaks do, and those are whatever needs > to change. I guess I'm visualizing my code from the top toward the bottom, > going from larger to smaller, but it dun matter at all to the browser! > > just tried your previous suggestion; worked swimmingly! > > Thank you! > > J > ______________________________________________________________________ > css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] > http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d > List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ > List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html > Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ -- Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic | ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
