Soon we'll be using flex box which, in my opinion, is the only non-hackish way of doing it.
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Tom Livingston <tom...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 1:56 PM, MiB <digital.disc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > 1 oct 2013 19.42 Tom Livingston: > > > >> This is a viable solution under the right circumstances. > > And just what did I just say? > > > > The solutions I linked to are worse, are they? > > > I don't believe I even eluded to any such thing. I was reiterating > your point of limited use cases. > > > -- > > Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic | > ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com > ______________________________________________________________________ > css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] > http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d > List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ > List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html > Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ > -- Chris Rockwell ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/