Soon we'll be using flex box which, in my opinion, is the only non-hackish
way of doing it.


On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Tom Livingston <tom...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 1:56 PM, MiB <digital.disc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > 1 oct 2013 19.42 Tom Livingston:
> >
> >> This is a viable solution under the right circumstances.
> >  And just what did I just say?
> >
> > The solutions I linked to are worse, are they?
>
>
> I don't believe I even eluded to any such thing. I was reiterating
> your point of limited use cases.
>
>
> --
>
> Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
> ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
> ______________________________________________________________________
> css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>



-- 
Chris Rockwell
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Reply via email to