It's as simple as that, thanks Tom ! :-)
Christopher
Tom Livingston <mailto:tom...@gmail.com>
Sunday, November 30, 2014 9:11 PM
IMHO you don't use a bg img that big. Maybe a bg img that's 1280x1024
or something close, compress the snot out of it with a lossless
compression tool and use background-size:cover; with an acceptable
fallback for browsers that don't support background-size. Of course,
this is only for desktop.
At the very least, set up an MQ for a min-width of 4k so that
monstrous img doesn't get delivered unless someone can actually use it.
Crest Christopher <mailto:crestchristop...@gmail.com>
Sunday, November 30, 2014 8:07 PM
I plan to make my site 4K/5K compatible, I was informed do not feed
users a 4K/5K image(s), taking that into consideration, what am I
suppose to do if the design requires a 4K/5K background image; cut it
up, the size of the combined slices may add equal to the file size of
a 4K / 5K image.
Am I thinking from a designer POV, not completely putting forward of
all possibilities with CSS ?
Christopher
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
